Mohan Prasad Kharel
Mohan Kharel |
I
received Gopi Sapkota’s collection of poems, A Suicide Note, in October amidst a busy schedule of school,
family, and work. I had heard about the
book before, but now I got something concrete in my hand, a publication from
someone who was my M.A. classmate, back in 1995.
I
somehow conquered the temptation to read the book right away so that I could
focus on my schoolwork. I waited for the semester end, but in the meantime I
kept wondering what might have made Gopi write on the topic of suicide.
At
the time I received Gopi’s book, I had to bear with some heartbreaking news of
suicides committed in Nepal, U.S.A. and Canada. Although suicide is not
anything new and writing on this topic has always been there in one form or
another, it is not at all a pleasant topic to talk about, and it is often a
controversial topic.
In
poetry, a poet basically expresses feelings. While Gopi embraces the topic of
suicide and seems to give it a hug, I constantly hid the book from my children
because I was worried that they might infer something sinister seeing A Suicide Note in their dad’s hand. Or
what if they learnt a few lessons from the book and concluded that suicide
could be a viable option?
In
literature, suicide can be a theme, or a metaphor, but in societies across the
globe it is a stigma, a taboo, and an indelible scar often associated with
illness. Apart from painful terminal illnesses when it seems logical for people
to decide to end their lives, not many people would endorse suicide as an
option. If they do, then there must be an existential crisis or a huge amount
of injustice. Reading Gopi’s poems in this collection, mostly on the theme of
death, left me confused whether his approval for the choice of death as an alternative
to life has to do with existential crisis or with social injustice.
Gopi
seems to be referring to hundreds of deaths a person dies on a daily basis due
to penury in this fiercely competitive and selfish society. It can also be
extended to social injustice, oppression, and their repercussions, leading to
drugs, depression, hence making suicide the only alternative. However, Gopi
seems ambivalent, or maybe too resigned, in terms of indicating the rationale
behind the choice of death when he says “Never earned to the level” in one
place and “One should die one day/ It’s about time; it’s about luck/You never
know how long you live.” How can one not blame the society or system that keeps
people so vulnerable? How much your service to the society is proportionally
reciprocated?
It
is always easy to preach and so immensely difficult to practice. Yes, the monstrous
system that keeps us powerless is so strong, so invisible, and so shrewd that
many of us would rather go into a bar or feel depressed or criticize the
politicians, or quietly leave the world, as not much is available to hold onto.
Interestingly, the world that has ever been blind and deaf to you until you
live seems to notice you once you leave the stage. And it
is this phenomenon of our time, or of all times, that seems to inspire Gopi to
write these poems, in which each endeavor of a common person looks hopelessly
dwarfish and insufficient to counter the systemic forces.
What
baffles me though is the tone of widespread resignation in some of his poems
that relate to the theme of death. Could it be a strategy to challenge the
establishment by celebrating suicide so much so that one day people will be
convinced that it is the best option and line-up for the journey to the other
world leaving behind a few capitalists wondering what went wrong?
No comments:
Post a Comment